BACKGROUND: Revision rhinoplasty may benefit from regenerative techniques.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate stem cell-enriched fat grafting in revision rhinoplasty cases.

RESULTS: Improved tissue quality and patient satisfaction were observed with no major complications.

CONCLUSION: Stem cell-enriched fat grafting is a useful adjunct in revision rhinoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Capsular contracture remains a challenge after breast augmentation.

METHODS: This study analyzed outcomes with regenerative adjuncts during contracture revision.

RESULTS: Lower recurrence and improved soft tissue environment were noted.

CONCLUSION: Regenerative adjuncts can enhance contracture management.

AIM: The study evaluates growth factor therapy for soft tissue regeneration around maxillofacial implants.

METHODS: Patients received regenerative treatment as part of implant rehabilitation.

RESULTS: Enhanced mucosal quality and reduced inflammation were observed.

CONCLUSION: Growth factor therapy supports implant-related soft tissue regeneration.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of stem cell-based scar revision in nasal surgery.

METHODS: Retrospective review of scar revision cases with stem cell therapy.

RESULTS: Scar appearance improved without adverse events.

CONCLUSION: The approach is safe and effective for nasal scar revision.

BACKGROUND: Complex midface defects require combined reconstructive strategies.

METHODS: Regenerative medicine approaches were integrated with surgical reconstruction.

RESULTS: Functional and aesthetic outcomes improved.

CONCLUSION: Regenerative medicine enhances complex midface reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Regenerative soft tissue support may improve breast reconstruction durability.

METHODS: Long-term follow-up was performed on reconstructions using regenerative support.

RESULTS: High implant stability and patient satisfaction were reported.

CONCLUSION: Regenerative soft tissue support is beneficial in breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate autologous stem cell suspension in craniofacial reconstruction.

METHODS: Patients underwent reconstruction with stem cell-enriched grafts.

RESULTS: Stable bone and soft tissue regeneration were confirmed.

CONCLUSION: Autologous stem cell suspension is advantageous for craniofacial reconstruction.

AIM: Investigate outcomes after facial trauma reconstruction using adipose-derived stem cells.

METHODS: Clinical outcomes of trauma cases were analyzed.

RESULTS: Improved healing and reduced scarring were observed.

CONCLUSION: Stem cell therapy supports facial trauma reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular defect reconstruction benefits from bone regeneration strategies.

METHODS: Stem cell-integrated techniques were applied to mandibular defect repair.

RESULTS: Successful bone regeneration and defect closure were achieved.

CONCLUSION: Stem cell integration is useful in mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Post-orthognathic facial contouring can be optimized with regenerative therapy.

METHODS: Adipose-derived stem cells were used in facial contour enhancement.

RESULTS: Satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and improved tissue quality were achieved.

CONCLUSION: Stem cell therapy is effective for post-orthognathic contour enhancement.

BACKGROUND: Combined platelet-rich plasma and stem cell therapy may improve facial soft tissue augmentation.

METHODS: A clinical cohort was treated with PRP and stem cell complexes.

RESULTS: Improved volume maintenance and skin texture were shown.

CONCLUSION: This combination therapy is promising for facial soft tissue augmentation.

PURPOSE: Evaluate lower eyelid rejuvenation with stem cell-enhanced filler.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated for periorbital rejuvenation.

RESULTS: Improved under-eye contour and skin quality were reported.

CONCLUSION: Stem cell-enhanced filler is effective for lower eyelid rejuvenation.

PURPOSE: Assess minimally invasive facial rejuvenation using autologous fat enriched with stem cells.

METHODS: A clinical series of patients underwent fat grafting with stem cell enrichment.

RESULTS: Enhanced skin texture and volume retention were observed.

CONCLUSION: The technique is effective for minimally invasive facial rejuvenation.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety profile of perioral regenerative treatments in aesthetic surgery.

METHODS: Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing perioral regenerative procedures.

RESULTS: High safety and satisfaction rates were observed.

CONCLUSION: Perioral regenerative treatment is safe in aesthetic practice.